researchaim和objectiv_育才学习网

researchaim怎么写

1.Research Report怎么写

Research Report是对文章中所提到的关于某一问题、某一事件、某一经验等相关内容，通过客观实际的调查和了解，在实践过程中调查到的全部资料和数据进行全面整理并且分析研究，揭示问题的本质，反应客观规律，再得出总结。最主要的是要完整的进行书面陈述。因此Research Report作为调研报告，其最核心的要求就是必须实事求是的反映客观和准确的分析。

简单的来说Research Report包含了两个部分，一调查，二研究。调查工作需要切入实际，准确的反映客观实际情况，在调查过程中不能加入作者主观的想象和猜测，要从调查对象的真实面目来了解事物，尽可能详细的掌握大量材料。研究工作就是在作者所掌握的客观材料的基础上进行严谨的分析，透彻并且准确的解释对象的本质。

2.research statement怎么写

research statement

研究报告

In recent years, there has been growing interests in conducting research on personal statement.

近年来，人们对个人陈述的研究兴趣越来越浓。

Chapter one provides an introduction by highlighting the background of the research, problem statement, significance of the study, research objectives and the general research scope.

第一章重点介绍此项研究的背景、问题陈述、研究意义、研究目标和大体研究范围。

Empirical Findings on the Research about Financial Statement Fraud: Literature Review& Analysis

财务报告舞弊特征研究的实证发现：文献综述与评论

3.怎么写 research interest

直接找你上课的教授问项目然后他一般叫你跟他的研究生做就行了

这样你的research interest 解决了关于research 方面的推荐信解决了

最好的就是找自己院里面出过国的老师，然后看他是否和国外教授合作过多篇论文

那这样的导师就是你的绝佳目标，将来的陶瓷信觉得含金量十足，然后套与这个老师有关系的国外教授，说你跟他的导师在做什么项目，然后你要在项目中认真学习实验技能和相关的知识，找教授相关的论文看，这样的陶瓷强有力！

4.英语专业论文Introduction和Abstract要怎么写

abstract字数少，内容笼统，包括：

1. background position

2.aim and thesis of the article

3.method of research

4.results of research

introduction要写的更细一些，在background在里要写之前别人的研究，你对实验结果的假设，在aim里写你的research的具体详细的目标，还有针对这个目标，那几个问题是最有价值的，并把它们写下来。

5.如何写Research Highlights

第一条你要看期刊的说明，每个期刊有相应的要求，请自己查阅该期刊的投稿要求或者已经发表的文章。

第二条：同上。是为了方便编辑进行重新排版（如果能发表），印制。

感谢丽雅Leah!

1）如果没有Research Highlights，稿件就不能上传，当时我把摘要改了一下作为Research Highlights文件，稿件也上传成功了. 我再去看看authors guide。这个Research Highlights which include 3-5 bullet points with a maximum of 85 characters including spaces (points exceeding 100 characters)，好像2楼所言，等同关键词。

2）稿件都没有送审，我原以为只寄一个PDF文件就够了。我试试用LaTeX排版，然后单独上传figure文件。

6.关于research proposal中的research method怎么写

Project Design and MethodsSample discussions of the methodsSample 1:2.MethodsData collectionThe data for the study were collected from 278 Internet users in the US and 347 Internet users in Korea over a 3-month period. In both places, student volunteers were instructed to obtain surveys from individuals in various age categories to allow greater generalizability of the findings. They were asked to make sure that the respondents had access to the Internet. The volunteers were also instructed to explain the research and the nature of participation to the respondents. This technique was chosen not only to increase response rates and minimize wasted questionnaires but also because researchers in Korea had found that the mail survey method was highly ineffective, frequently resulting in a very low response rate and/or a high rate of unusable responses (Shim and Cho, 2000). In order to increase the person's desire to participate in the study, a small gift was presented to all respondents.The respondents were asked to visit the JCPenney website in their respective countries (jcpenney.com for the US and jcpenneykorea.com for Korea). They were then asked to browse the site for 15–20 min, scrolling up and down the pages, clicking on links and using any features that interested them on the site. After reviewing the site, the participants were asked to fill out the questionnaire. JCPenney was chosen because it was one of a few International companies operating retail websites in both countries that were ideally parallel in format, design, amount and type of information provided, product categories offered and types of consumer services provided.1 Jcpenneykorea.com was launched in May 2001 by JCPenney International Catalog Korea, the US chain's exclusive marketing representative for Korea. The company also operates a mail-order catalogue business and an exhibition centre in Korea. The catalogues have been distributed to approximately 300 000 customers, out of whom an estimated 100 000 have made purchases from the catalogues (The Korea Economic Daily, 2001, p. 21).The self-administered questionnaire consisted of three sections. The first section contained 36 questions from WebQual™ tapping 12 different dimensions of website quality. The second section included questions assessing the respondents' satisfaction with the site and their behavioural intention to purchase from the site. The final section consisted of questions about the respondents' demographic characteristics (i.e. age, education, gender, income and marital status). Additionally, they were asked how many years they had been using the Internet, how many times they had purchased from an online retailer in the past year, and whether or not they had previously purchased from the JCPenney website. For the US sample, respondents were also asked whether or not they had purchased from JCPenney catalogues and how often they had shopped at the company's conventional stores.In order to preserve equivalence in cross-cultural adaptation of WebQual™ scale, the questionnaire, originally written in English, was translated into Korean by both researchers. It was then translated back into English by two bilingual Koreans. One of the researchers reviewed the back-translation and compared it to the original English version. As a result, modification was made in the wording of some of the questions in the Korean version of the questionnaire. Prior to the main survey, the questionnaire was also pre-tested in each country, using a small convenience sample, to ensure readability.Sample characteristicsThe age of the US sample ranged from 18 to 67 with an average age of 32 years, whereas the age of the Korean sample ranged from 20 to 48 with an average of 32 years. About 46% of the US respondents were older than 30 years, whereas 53% of the Koreans were above 30. Females represented 58% of the US sample (n = 162) and 48% of the Korean sample (n = 167). Fifty-nine per cent of the US sample and 50% of the Korean sample were single. Only 54% of the US respondents were employed whereas the majority of the Korean respondents (77%) were employed. Nearly half of the US sample reported an annual household income for 2001 of $50 000 or more. By contrast, only 4% of the Korean sample reported a similar household income. However, it is important to note that the average income of the Korean population in 2001 was $24 231 (Korea International Labor Foundation, 2005) compared with $42 228 for the US population (US Census Bureau, 2002). Thirty per cent of the 。